Impeachment talk by federal workers could violate Hatch Act, new guidance says

Impeachment talk by federal workers could violate Hatch Act, new guidance says

First Amendment

New guidance on prohibited political activity by federal employees warns that workplace talk of impeachment and resistance is banned by the Hatch Act.
The guidance was distributed this week by the Office of Special Counsel, which enforces the Hatch Act and is a different agency than special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, report the Washington Post and the New York Times.
The Hatch Act prevents federal employees from engaging in political activity at work.
The guidance says impeachment talk and resistance references are improper at work when they are directed at an office holder who is running for re-election—and President Donald Trump is running for a second term.
“Advocating for a candidate to be impeached, and thus potentially disqualified from holding federal office, is clearly directed at the failure of that candidate’s campaign for federal office,” says the guidance, entitled “Guidance regarding political activity.”
Similarly, the word resistance and its hashtag references have “become inextricably linked with the electoral success (or failure) of the president,” the guidance says. “Now that President Trump is a candidate for re-election, we must presume the use or display of ‘resistance,’ ‘#resist,’ ‘#resistTrump’ and similar statements is political activity unless the facts and circumstances indicate otherwise.”
The new guidance is spurring some First Amendment concerns. Among those raising objections is the ethics nonprofit American Oversight, which sent a letter asking for the guidance to be withdrawn.
Employees should be able to express their views that officials violated their oath to uphold the Constitution, the group’s executive director, Austin Evers, wrote in the letter. “Certainly, there is a difference between advocating that an official should (or should not) be elected and advocating that an official did (or did not) commit treason or high crimes and misdemeanors under the Constitution,” the letter said.
The group argued that the guidance could constrain whistleblowers who fear Hatch Act liability for reporting impeachable offenses.
In addition, the letter said, the First Amendment protects the right to object to administration action or policies. “Conflating resistance terminology with electoral advocacy opens the door to public employees being retaliated against for their policy positions or opinions,” the letter said.

READ  Of All The Stupid Things To Do…

Be Sociable, Share!

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination.Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market.A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place.Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc. © 1994-2019 All Rights Reserved
Scroll Up