Job-seeking lawyer loses age discrimination case before full 7th Circuit

Labor & Employment

A Chicago-area lawyer who challenged an experience cap in a legal job ad has lost his case before the en banc 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Chicago.

The 7th Circuit ruled 8-4 Wednesday that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects workers but not outside job applicants in suits for disparate-impact discrimination.

Federal appeals courts have split on the issue, the Chicago Tribune reported in a profile of the case in September.

Judge Michael Scudder, a Trump appointee, wrote the majority opinion for the Chicago-based court. The National Law Journal and Courthouse News Service have coverage.

The court ruled in the case of Dale Kleber, who was 58 when he applied for a senior counsel position in March 2014 at the medical technology company CareFusion.

The job ad said applicants should have no more than seven years of relevant legal experience.

Kleber had much more experience, including a past position as general counsel at Dean Foods and CEO of a dairy products trade group. He did not get the CareFusion job. It went instead to a 29-year-old applicant.

The decision turned on the meaning of the word individual, which appears in two sections of the law. The first section applies to intentional discrimination, and the second refers to disparate-impact discrimination.

The first section of the law applies to job applicants as well as employees, but the second section is less clear. It states that it is unlawful for an employer “to limit, segregate or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s age.”

READ  Equality Act would afford federal protections to LGBTQ+ individuals, ABA president urges

According to the majority, reading the section in its entirety “shows that Congress employed the term ‘any individual’ as a shorthand reference to someone with ‘status as an employee.’ ”

CareFusion had argued that the experience cap was based on a reasonable concern that a person with many years of experience would not be satisfied with less complex tasks or comfortable taking direction from a lawyer with less experience.

But Kleber told the Chicago Tribune in September that the company was making an unfair assumption. “I don’t think they’re in a position to tell me which job I’m interested in,” he said. “If I didn’t want the job, I wouldn’t have applied for it.”

Any contention that applicants are “overqualified,” he said, is really “a code word for ‘too old.’ ”

Kleber was represented by Dara Smith of the AARP Foundation. She told the National law Journal in a statement that they are “considering our options for next steps.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Follow Us!

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination. Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market. A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place. Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

Scroll Up