Kavanaugh decision rejects First Amendment claim against public access channel

Kavanaugh decision rejects First Amendment claim against public access channel

First Amendment

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Monday against two producers who argued that a public access TV channel violated their First Amendment rights when it stopped airing their video.

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Neil M. Gorsuch.

The majority ruled that the private operator of public access channels on Time Warner’s cable system in Manhattan was not a state actor subject to the First Amendment. The operator was Manhattan Neighborhood Network, known as MNN.

New York law had required cable systems to set aside some channels for neighborhood access. New York City designated MNN to operate the public access channels. MNN said it stopped airing the video because of harassing and threatening language directed at MNN staff.

A broad, contrary ruling could have had implications for the internet, according to amicus briefs filed in the case. If the Supreme Court had deemed MNN to be a state actor, internet search engines and social media sites might not be able to exercise editorial judgment to take down offensive content, the Internet Association argued. Reuters had coverage of the briefs.

The producers had argued that MNN could be liable because it exercised a traditional public function when it operated the channels. Kavanaugh said that wasn’t enough. “Rather, to qualify as a traditional, exclusive public function within the meaning of our state-action precedents, the government must have traditionally and exclusively performed the function,” Kavanaugh said.

READ  Sedgwick confirms some staff layoffs after more partner departures

Nor does being regulated by the state transform MNN into a state actor, Kavanaugh said.

Kavanaugh added that MNN is subject to state-law constraints on its exercise of editorial discretion, and it “could perhaps face state-law sanctions or liability of some kind.” He also noted that this is not a case in which a local government is operating a cable access channel.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and Elena Kagan.

Sotomayor argued that MNN “stepped into the city’s shoes and thus qualifies as a state actor, subject to the First Amendment like any other.”

Be Sociable, Share!
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination.Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market.A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place.Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc. © 1994-2019 All Rights Reserved
Scroll Up