Suit seeking to hold gunmaker liable in Sandy Hook shootings can proceed after SCOTUS denies cert

Suit seeking to hold gunmaker liable in Sandy Hook shootings can proceed after SCOTUS denies cert

Trials & Litigation

gavel and bullets

Image from Shutterstock.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal by the maker of the Bushmaster semi-automatic rifle in a suit seeking to hold the gun manufacturer liable for the shootings at the Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The Supreme Court allowed the suit to go forward when it rejected the cert request by the Remington Arms Co. on Tuesday, report the Associated Press and the Connecticut Law Tribune.

The Connecticut Supreme Court had ruled in March that Remington could be sued over alleged marketing practices that violate the state’s unfair trade practices law. The court said a 2005 federal law that insulates gun manufacturers and sellers from liability for shootings did not bar the state law claim.

The suit was filed on behalf of a surviving staff member and the families of nine children killed in the December 2012 mass shooting. Twenty children and six adults were killed at the Connecticut school by the shooter, Adam Lanza, who also killed his mother and himself.

The plaintiffs had contended the Bushmaster used by Lanza was designed for military use but was instead marketed to civilians, including younger, at-risk males.

At issue was the reach of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which generally preempts claims against makers and sellers of firearms for the criminal use of their products. An exception withdraws liability protection for knowing violations of state and federal laws.

READ  Acting AG Whitaker backed patent marketing company even as he fielded angry complaints, papers show

Remington had argued in its cert petition that the exception does not apply to broad, generally applicable state statutes such as Connecticut’s Unfair Trade Practices Act. The company argued the Connecticut Supreme Court had given the exception too broad a reading.

The case is Remington Arms Co. v. Soto. The SCOTUSblog case page is here.

Be Sociable, Share!
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination.Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market.A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place.Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc. © 1994-2019 All Rights Reserved
Scroll Up