Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to citizenship question on census

U.S. Supreme Court

Photo by Maria Dryfhout/Shutterstock.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide whether a citizenship question may be added to the 2020 census and scheduled arguments for the case in April.

The court granted cert before any appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at New York and put the case “on an unusually fast track,” the New York Times reports. The apparent aim is to issue a decision before census forms are printed in June. The National Law Journal and the Washington Post also have coverage of the cert grant; an American Civil Liberties Union press release is here.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of Manhattan had ruled in the case last month, finding that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross violated the Administrative Procedure Act in a “veritable smorgasbord” of ways when he added the question.

Furman said Ross ignored statutes on data collection and notice to Congress, acted arbitrarily, and concealed the true basis for his decision. But Furman found no violation of the due process clause because the plaintiffs did not prove Ross was motivated by discrimination against noncitizens and minorities.

Ross had said he was adding the citizenship question in response to a request from the Department of Justice for better citizenship data to assist in its enforcement of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But Furman said the evidence showed that Ross had persuaded the DOJ to make the request, showing his stated reason was pretextual.

READ  9th Circuit nominee is withdrawn after controversy over his college writings

The Supreme Court had blocked Ross’ deposition in October but allowed the deposition of a DOJ lawyer to go forward. In November, the Supreme Court allowed trial of the case.

Two lawsuits have been consolidated in the case. One was filed by 18 states, as well as several cities and counties. The other was filed by several advocacy groups. The American Civil Liberties Union, the New York Civil Liberties Union and Arnold & Porter had sued on behalf of the groups.

The plaintiffs have argued that the question will reduce head count because immigrants will be reluctant to participate.

The House of Representatives has filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers, according to the National Law Journal. The brief points out that an inaccurate count will affect state representation in the House as well as the flow of federal dollars to the states.


Be Sociable, Share!
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblr

Follow Us!
FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinyoutubeFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinyoutube

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination. Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market. A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place. Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

Scroll Up