Supreme Court denies emergency stay regarding secrecy of donors to political nonprofits

Election Law

- Supreme Court denies emergency stay regarding secrecy of donors to political nonprofits

Shutterstock.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a petition to grant an emergency stay on a ruling that tossed out federal election regulation allowing nonprofit groups to keep donors secret.

The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Associated Press have coverage.

The ruling by the Federal District Court in Washington D.C. requires that nonprofits placing advertisements in support or opposition of candidates must identify individuals who donated more than $200 and strikes decades-old Federal Election Commission regulation, the Times and Post report.

The lawsuit was filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group also known as CREW, against the FEC and Crossroads GPS. It stems from a complaint CREW filed six years ago asking that donors who funded a $6 million Crossroads campaign against Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, be revealed, according to the Post.

FEC deadlocked on its decision and to investigate Crossroads and dismissed the complaint in 2015. CREW filed the federal lawsuit against the agency in 2016.

Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell issued her ruling Aug. 3. She gave the FEC 45 days to develop new regulations requiring more donor disclosure. Her ruling will be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Post reports.

Tuesday’s order by the high court vacates one entered Saturday by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who temporarily blocked the district court ruling, according to the Times. There were no dissents in the Tuesday’s order, writes University of California law and political science professor Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog.

READ  Judge orders detention of public defender for ‘acting like I’m some kind of idiot’

“This is an important decision which will help insure that voters have valuable information they need in evaluating advertising which is unquestionably aimed at trying to influence how they vote in elections. It does not solve all of the current disclosure problems, but this is a victory for transparency,” Hasen wrote.


Be Sociable, Share!
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblr

Follow Us!
FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinyoutubeFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinyoutube

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is president and managing partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a local search and digital marketing agency that offers clients lead generation, local seo and Google Maps Domination. Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping attorneys grow their practice, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency’s cutting-edge services to the legal market. A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place. Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, their lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping law firms grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

Scroll Up